Entrevista
Interview with Antonio Moneo, senior associate in the area of open knowledge at the Inter-American Development Bank.
Which is the role of the IDB in the open data ecosystem in Latin America and the Caribbean?
The Inter-American Development Bank is a multilateral organization that provides support to countries to finance major reforms of the administration and infrastructure. Through several departments, especially through the Division of Institutional Capacity of the State, the Bank has accompanied many countries in Latin America and the Caribbean in the development of open government policies, training programs for civil servants, technological infrastructures for publishing open data and many activities to generate international and local commitment.
The IDB has always opened spaces and channels to share their knowledge with countries. In recent years it has significantly increased the scope of these efforts by creating a digital library of technical publications, a blog network, the open data portal "Números para el Desarrollo", offering massive online open courses (IDBx), and a working line to open knowledge where we include progressively open innovation methodologies that the Bank uses to articulate open ecosystems. Moreover, we are planning to continue expanding the number, quality and type of open knowledge products. Stay tuned to the following updates.
Which are the main objectives of your blog "Open to the public"? How does your blog contribute and help the open knowledge sector and community?
The blog was launched in 2014 as a space to learn about the evolution of open knowledge in Latin America and the Caribbean, which has been a pioneer at different times and in different cases. Open government policies as in the case of the city of Buenos Aires, or the Government of Chile, made us think of the potential of open knowledge to foster innovation in the public sector.
This approach has always led us to pay attention to the spillover effects of opening up knowledge, which often goes unnoticed. We saw that opening up knowledge helps governments be more transparent, but above all establish channels to improve the design of public policies. Thus, when we open up the knowledge we contribute to the dual goal of making administration more transparent and accelerate economic development in the region.
I think the biggest contribution of the blog has been serving as a repository of real examples, recommendations and methodologies on how open knowledge promotes the country development in Latin America and the Caribbean. Our articles have let many people know specific examples which show that open knowledge is truly useful. To date, we have published more than 200 articles, many of them from external partners, and we have a community of 16,000 subscribers. We receive an average of thirty thousand visitors per month from all countries worldwide. We have almost a million visits in total.
“Opening up knowledge helps governments be more transparent, but above all establish channels to improve the design of public policies”.
You are a member of the Open Data Charter, which role does the Open Data Charter play? Which will be the next steps of this global initiative?
The Open Data Charter is an universal declaration aimed at standardizing the open data definition. Though its non-binding nature, it enjoys sufficient legitimacy to generate a shift globally. It is an essential tool to establish the framework for public discussion on open data, and it will be critical for governments and cities which are approving plans within the framework of the Alliance for Open Government. For me, it would be ideal that the countries in the region commit themselves to adopt and implement the Charter within its Action Plans in the Alliance for Open Government.
The Open Data Charter has been promoted by an international and interdisciplinary group now divided into five working groups. These working groups strive to collect examples of how open data are being used in cities and private sector; to develop tools for specific sectors or issues specially important such as the fight against corruption; to generate theoretical frameworks for analyzing the impact of open data and tools to facilitate the implementation of the Charter.
Since the IDB has organized several data hackathons, which barriers are found organizing such events?
Identifying the expectations is always a key issue. It is essential that the hackathon is seen as a milestone in an open innovation process, and not as a single event. At each hackathon we work for months to select challenges, create institutional partnerships, open databases and train those who will participate in the event. If the hackathon is assessed by the number of viable projects obtained, it is difficult to obtain good results, and indicators which are more important are also lost.
If expectations are well identified, obstacles can be reduced to mere milestones of a project. If the challenges are significant, it will not be difficult to find allies. If allies are strong, it will not be difficult to open up data. And if you know what your participants need, it will not be difficult to train them. It is a question of good expectations.
In your opinion, at what point of maturity is the open data sector and the re-use of public sector information in Latin America and the Caribbean?
Latin America and the Caribbean are experiencing a very interesting time. Fifteen countries in Latin America and the Caribbean are attached to the Alliance for Open Government, and eleven of them were evaluated by the last Open Data Barometer. The trend is unequal and I think the conversation is more focused on the debate on the access to information, which is the basis to talk about re-use. There is much to do.
However, in regional forums such as the Regional Conference on Open Data, the Latin American Open Data Initiative or the regional summit of the Alliance for Open Government Partnership we see how the discussion about standards occupies growing space. For me, this is a sign that we are moving gradually towards a model of re-use of data. It is good news and I would like to see a law enacted on the re-use of data in the future.
“The trend is unequal and I think the conversation is more focused on the debate on the access to information, which is the basis to talk about re-use.”
What do you believe the main barriers are for open publication in Latin America and the Caribbean unlike other regions of the world?
The lack of regional integration is the main barrier. Latin America and the Caribbean need to institutionalize the regional debate on access and re-use of information. It is difficult to obtain sustainable results if there are no standards to standardize and link openness processes. In that sense, I think the debate on transparency should be extended to include the issue of technical interoperability. It is important that the information is public but also re-used, and, for that to happen, it is essential to publish it in a standardized way.
Nevertheless, the solution requires a greater effort to train civil servants. It is not just a technical problem. In fact, there are standards, but they are not properly implemented. It is necessary to train civil servants to understand how open data can help improve public policies. When the head of a department in a ministry understands the potential of the data, it is easier to address the issue of interoperability.
”The lack of regional integration is the main barrier. Latin America and the Caribbean need to institutionalize the regional debate on access and re-use of information.”
As a specialist consultant on open knowledge, what do you think the main differences are between Latin America and Spain as regards the focus on open data policies?
In the regulatory matter we can say that the European Union is a privileged environment which has facilitated many discussions. Directive 2003/98/EC on re-use of public sector information was the basis for further regulations on interoperability and the European statistical system upon which EUROSTAT relies. Spain adopted this directive in 2007 and, since then, it has been able to frontally address the problem of interoperability.
In Latin America and the Caribbean I see a high participation of civil society what I would like to see replicated in Europe. There is good coordination between organizations in different countries, and together they have played a very important role in the legislative development of open data. I find very interesting the emergence of government laboratories where is institutionalizing the relationship between government and civil society is being institutionalized in the field of re-use of data to improve public policy.
Evento
“Crowd-sourcing questions that if answered could radically increase our understanding of open data”
On October 5th, international researchers will gather at the second Open Data Research Symposium (ODRS); a pre-event to the International Open Data Conference to be held in Madrid. As in the previous edition, ODRS 16 will offer attendees the opportunity to reflect critically on the results of their investigations while cohesion is sought within the research community about the potential impacts of open data.
Though the ODRS call for proposals ended last May, the deadline has been extended to all members of the open data movement to help shape the program of the event, focusing on the most relevant aspects in the field. To do this, the organization has created a specific section on the Symposium website where users can submit questions for researchers to resolve their doubts about open data. Moreover, it is also possible to send the questions via Twitter using the hashtag #ODSR16. The deadline is July 1st.
Thanks to user’s questions, it will be possible to identify the topics of interest to the international open data community, draft the ODRS program to ensure sessions are tailored to the needs of the participants, build a collaborative agenda and report efforts and collaborations that take place during the meeting.
More information about the pre-events to the annual open data meeting? Stay tuned to the website of the International Open Data Conference. See you in Madrid!
Evento
On 29th-30th June the European Data Forum will take place in the Dutch city of Eindhoven. Under the slogan "Scaling up the Data Economy in Europe", this event will bring together professionals, researchers, legislators and members of several initiatives to discuss about the challenges and opportunities arising from the data in the EU. Thus, during these two days, this forum will address all facets of data-driven innovators: big data, from infrastructure, tools, applications (including new products and multilingual services for different European audiences) as well as societal and economic impact.
This event is relevant for all stakeholders involved in the data value chain, they will be shown the cutting-edge innovative industrial applications of big data technologies to upcoming innovation breakthroughs. This forum is designed as a meeting point where participants will have the opportunity to exchange experiences and ideas, which will be used to find solutions to current challenges and to design EU policies in order to strengthen the European data economy while it becomes a global leader in this area.
The European Data Forum will consist of more than forty talks, an exhibition and the presentation of a set of posters selected by the organizing committee which belong to one of the following categories:
1. Posters with a practical, industry- or user-oriented focus by representatives of technology providers and organizations. Innovative data applications in different sectors of the European Economy: agro food, automotive, education and skills, healthcare, media, policy, smart industry, urban smart living, and others.
2. Posters with a technical focus reporting concrete experiences by representatives of academia and research centres. This category includes new data models and languages, optimized architectures, content analytics, data mining, predictive analytics, predictive models, semantic technologies, geospatial data techniques and systems for contextualization and personalization.
3. Posters with a specific focus on impact-creation activities including policy development, road-mapping, standardisation, exploitation and training, data-driven business models, data governance and open data.
The forum is expected to overcome the success recorded in the last edition, held in 2014, where more than 600 people from more than 360 organizations attended the event in Greece. The participants had the opportunity to attend for two days three panels related to NeSSI, big data, collaboration and interoperability; in addition, there were thirty talks organized in different networking sessions devoted to the following topics: open data, best practices, Horizon 2020 working program and data usage.
Thanks to the European Commission support and the large number of technological initiatives of big data, open data and linked data; data economy includes a large number of European stakeholders, interested in adding value to the information. In this context, the European Forum has established itself as an excellent opportunity to join synergies at European level to advance and achieve common solutions and strategies that position the EU as a leader in global data economy.
Evento
Next 15th the event eventotransparente.org will take place in Madrid, a day in which best practices, open government policies and models in Spain will be analyzed. Driven by the Oesía Group and collaborating in the Gobiernotransparente.com and Docxpresso organization, the meeting consists of four panels, through which participants will have the opportunity to learn the experience of experts, public and private entities on open data initiatives, open government, legislation transparency and citizen participation at national level.
The aim of this meeting is sharing common knowledge to improve institutions and companies while participants discuss innovation and transparency as a tool to improve the efficiency and control of public administrations and the need to involve citizens in public processes.
This free event will take place in the cultural space MediaLab Prado and due to capacity limitations, those interested in attending the conference need to register through an online form; if the registrations exceed the number of vacancies, preference will be given to attendees belonging to public administration and civil society.
Entrevista
Interview with Fernanda Peset, professor of the Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, Department of Communication Studies, Documentation and History of Art.
Analyze the current situation of open publication of scientific results in Spain. In comparison to other countries, what point has been reached?
In the case of scientific results, two major groups have to be distinguished: publications and data. This was already pointed out in 2012, when the European Commission implemented a survey on digital preservation, which, in the case of publications, had advanced enormously and, in the case of the data underlying the research, was just beginning.
Which are the main obstacles that hinder the opening of data by the scientific community?
In the survey carried out during the project DATASEA, researchers suggest that the reasons of concern are: the misuse or interpretation and legal questions about confidentiality and intellectual property rights. Some also said they were losing time making them available or they feared that others take the lead in research thanks to their data. In general, we try to squeeze the samples as much as possible, but critics are also feared.
What measures are considered necessary to promote and boost the culture of open data in the research field?
Undoubtedly, recognition of the release of scientific results is essential to generalize it. Parameters of the assessment of a scientific are very clear in calls for career advancement and in the organizations themselves. Under pressure, researchers choose to monetize their work, which means spend as much time as possible for publications in refereed journals or obtaining patents. This would be the way of incentives, but also the obligations undertaken to obtain financing or publish in a particular journal can be decisive to invest the necessary time to open them up. Ideally, both routes are combined, which always require data literacy and support of organizations, something that is now beginning in Spain.
Under pressure, researchers choose to monetize their work, which means spend as much time as possible for publications in refereed journals or obtaining patents.
Under the framework of Horizon2020 program, a pilot project was launched in 2013 to improve and maximize the reuse of research data. Which are the conclusions three years later?
We are not aware that the European Commission has published evidences in this field. However, it could be said that the pilot plan has encouraged researchers, being or not part of it, to view their research from this perspective. Although it is not compulsory, including in the Impact section how they will get, manage and release the data, always contributes to a better evaluation of their proposals.
Moreover, both research management offices and information services are preparing for a demand for advice on it. For example, the translation of requirements H2020 in the DMP (Data management plan) tool, called PAGODA, by Madroño consortium has been a strategic positioning.
Finally, the draft of the open science agenda provides explicitly for the development of an open data policy, and for this purpose a panel of experts is being formed.
What is the OAI, Open Archive Initiative, and which are the main features of its protocol OAI-PMH?
At the philosophical level, it is the first big step to break with traditional forms of access to science. The increase in journal prices in the 80s was getting worse the gap among countries and organizations of first and second order. Thereafter, the green and gold ways to open access -listings and magazines, respectively- make up what we are currently living. The orders derived from Open Access movement have been essential in the opening up of scientific information. However, from my point of view, the model has been distorted, as it is shown by the high cost invested to pay the golden via. The research funding is being earmarked in part to the publication, and, therefore, sometimes to support the publishing industry. But it is not possible to adopt extreme positions, without this industry we would not have the services that we currently have access...
As regards the main features of the protocol I think its design and ease of implementation have been the determining factors for its success. Dividing the provision of information on data providers and service providers which can reap the metadata of the first revolutionized the scene and saved costs worldwide.
The orders derived from Open Access movement have been essential in the opening up of scientific information.
What would it be necessary to make the scientific and research community value the role of open data and its reuse?
After having experienced personally the open access movement since its inception, I think some issues will happen again. In fact some statements about open access already included data. And from that experience it is worth stressing the need of apostolate of the different agents involved: the scientific sector itself, from the academic and political authorities and support services. The support is essential to reach a successful end and, in this regard, the education –data literacy- will be increasingly necessary.
Evento
Last Wednesday the conference Open Data for European Entrepreneurs was held in Pamplona gathering the FIWARE community. The event was organized by FINODEX accelerator that provides support services to European ICT industry building technological solutions re-using open data and making use of the open platform FIREWARE.
The roadshow was divided into different panels focussing on two main areas: FIWARE technology, a simple set of APIs that ease the development of smart applications in multiple vertical sectors, and open data entrepreneurship.
Based on both thematic lines, the fist panel offered to the assistants the opportunity to know real stories of entrepreneurs who, using the potential of open data, have developed innovative solutions such as the start-ups belonging to FINODEX Project. In fact, the three finalists of this program attended the event to share their experience with the public.
Linkovate, first finalist, has developed a search engine that helps manufacturing and R&D equipment in companies to find technologies and partners. The second prize went to Xpressomics, who has also created a seeker but, in this case, of genetic information aimed at pharmaceutical industry and medical researchers. Lastly, Geezar and its Fruitwatcher was also present with a device that monitors the conditions of fruit in trucks to guarantee it reaches its destinations in perfect conditions.
Later, it was accelerators’ turn, companies that provide financial support and advice to entrepreneurs on their way to success and, after this round table, the expert from FIREWARE Foundation, Juanjo Hierro gave a talk as well as the Executive Officer at CDTI who underlined the role of public sector in technological innovation.
Moreover, lastly the conference was attended by representatives of Iniciativa Aporta -public sector programme to promote the re-use of open data in Spain- who presented the global open data meeting: the International Open Data Conference, held in Madrid by early October. A new opportunity to know how open data can become the raw material for new products and services as those developed within FINODEX Project.
Entrevista
CRAs Aragón permite conocer la distribución y evolución de los Colegios Rurales Agrupados de Aragón. Esta iniciativa recibió el premio “Idea más novedosa” y “Votación de los Participantes” durante el Jacathon 2014.
Javier Rubio, en representación de su equipo (formado por Dani Latorre, Jesús Varón y Rafael Ramos) ha compartido su visión personal sobre las oportunidades y desafíos de sector open data en España.
Como miembros de los equipos ganadores del evento Jacathon, conocéis de cerca el mundo de los datos abiertos y su reutilización. ¿Qué oportunidades ofrece el open data para el desarrollo empresarial en España y qué aspectos son necesarios mejorar para seguir avanzando en la apertura de la información?
Desde mi punto de vista, para avanzar es necesario un cambio de mentalidad a varios niveles. Para poder crear un impacto real que abra la puerta al desarrollo de nuevas oportunidades empresariales (actualmente difícil, debido en parte a la mala calidad, en forma y fondo, de los datos publicados), no es necesario que las entidades involucradas reinventen la rueda, basta con aprender de las lecciones de otros países:
- Cambiar de mentalidad sobre la granularidad (por la privacidad). Hay una obsesión generalizada con no publicar ciertos datos llegando a un nivel de granularidad útil. Por ejemplo, es imposible encontrar datos sobre educación que sirvan para algo, con el pretexto de proteger la privacidad de los menores o no crear escuelas malas. Si observáramos más las experiencias en otros países, aprenderíamos que es factible publicar datos útiles granulares totalmente anónimos, sin invadir la privacidad, y lo que es más, podríamos analizar el impacto positivo que causa en las escuelas la necesidad de mejorar. Pero no conozco entidades involucradas en open data que se atrevan si quiera a plantear un estudio profundo de ciertas experiencias de otros países.
Ejemplos de datos que ahora mismo nadie se atreve a publicar y sí se está haciendo en otros países serían delitos geolocalizados a diario, resultados de notas granularizados por escuela, registros de visitas de edificios públicos (como ciudadano me interesa saber si un dirigente político se reunió con un empresario y al mes legislaron cambiando las normas del sector al que pertenecía el empresario, por ejemplo), registro de la propiedad, registro mercantil (ambos sin tasas)... Algún link a proyectos.
- Ejemplo de proyecto de estudio de publicación de resultados escolares en Londres berglondon.comprojectsschooloscope
- Ejemplo de granularidad de crímenes en USA, que permitió un desarrollo empresarial aquí impensable por la falta de granularidad y periodicidad de publicación de datos similares trulia.comrealestateNeorkNeorkcrime.
- Cambiar de mentalidad sobre las dimensiones de los datos a publicar. Los logros en open data a nivel local suelen situarse dentro de la dimensión de servicios al ciudadano y, en concreto, de transporte público (publicación de horarios en tiempo real de autobuses y otros medios de transporte, por ejemplo). Sin embargo los avances en las otras dimensiones del open data, como la publicación de contratas públicas o la transparencia en general, son irrisorios. La variedad de formatos de publicación debido a la fragmentación es tal, que supone un esfuerzo titánico el plantear que alguien intente procesar tales datos y, por tanto, frena cualquier posible innovación empresarial alrededor.
- Cambiar de mentalidad sobre cumplir la ley (y punto). Lo que he observado, y esto sí es más una percepción personal, es que ahora mismo todo el open data en España depende del esfuerzo de funcionarios entregados, que entienden el impacto brutal que puede llegar a lograrse. Es decir, sin esas personas, no hay open data a ese nivel local (y la Ley de Transparencia no soluciona esto). Lo que es todavía peor, cuando se realizan estos proyectos, otras personas involucradas de la administración, que llevan el tema de informática, sólo se preocupan de cumplir la ley (y punto), es decir, si la ley no les obliga a publicar la información de una manera estructurada y fácil de consumir, entonces qué más da. Parece que lo importante sea publicar sets de datos, sin importar su calidad de contenido (y entre miles de sets inútiles, encontrar los interesantes es buscar una aguja en un pajar) ni su calidad de forma (como un pdf que es un escaneo en imagen y no texto), para así autocolgarse medallas vacías y salir en la foto. Así, es imposible un desarrollo empresarial sobre el mundo del open data.
Como usuarios y reutilizadores de los datos abiertos ¿Qué barreras os habéis encontrado a la hora de reutilizar la información pública y qué medidas creéis que deben adoptarse a medio plazo para impulsar la reutilización en España?
La barrera fundamental es, como ya he introducido en parte en la pregunta anterior, la mala calidad de los datos publicados, su poca utilidad en muchos casos (cantidad sobre calidad es la realidad actual), su fragmentación en docenas de microportales y APIs, y la desidia por cumplir los estándares existentes de estructuración y publicación de datos que facilitan su uso y consumo.
En cuanto a las medidas de impulso, creo que se ha desperdiciado una oportunidad de oro con la Ley de Transparencia (si bien aún se puede mejorar con las leyes autonómicas que están en proceso de publicación). La Ley de Transparencia no sólo no obliga a publicar los datos de forma adecuada, (que habría eliminado ese problema de raíz), sino que tampoco soluciona la fragmentación, permite excepciones para no publicar datos que resultan increíbles, obliga a un proceso farragoso para pedir nuevos datos al gobierno (DNI electrónico, más cantidad de formularios…).
Una buena medida sería prohibir la venta de datos públicos, obligando a que dichos datos que actualmente son de pago, se publiquen gratuitamente y con libre licencia de redistribución y uso. En concreto, hablo del Registro de la Propiedad, o el Registro Mercantil, o el Cendoj, controlados actualmente por lobbies de registradores que se lucran vendiendo datos que son libres a todos los niveles en otros países. Estos datos incluyen cosas como la información sobre las empresas públicas y privadas, o en el caso del Cendoj, todas las sentencias del Supremo (actualmente consultables con un buscador propio, pero de pago para su reutilización). Esto claramente frena la innovación y el desarrollo de iniciativas empresariales (por no hablar del derecho del ciudadano a conocer libremente dichos datos).
“La mala calidad de los datos publicados, su poca utilidad en muchos casos (…) y su fragmentación en docenas de microportales y APIs”.
Los hackathones se han convertido en la ocasión perfecta para que desarrolladores, emprendedores e infomediarios puedan conocer a representantes de entidades privadas y organismos públicos que apoyen sus proyectos. ¿Qué oportunidades os ofrece haber sido uno de los ganadores de Jacathon y cuáles serán vuestros siguientes pasos?
Lo bueno de los hackatones es que generan prototipos funcionales en muy breve tiempo, así que son una semilla de innovación, y por otro lado, obligan a una serie de profesionales de múltiples disciplinas a indagar y aprender sobre el open data español. Personalmente, el ganar el Jacathon me ha hecho abrir los ojos y me ha ofrecido por ejemplo la oportunidad de hablar con entidades relacionadas (como es el caso de esta entrevista), que tienen en su mano el mejorar la situación actual. Por desgracia un hackathon rara vez da lugar a continuar la idea, si no se teje una red alrededor de organizadores y participantes, que intente crear continuidad o generar proyectos paralelos posteriores.
No tengo claros los siguientes pasos porque realizar aplicaciones sobre el open data actual es francamente difícil y arriesgado si se trata de un proyecto empresarial, sin embargo sé que seguiré estudiando las fuentes de datos, proponiendo mejoras, siendo crítico (y ser crítico no significa no apreciar el esfuerzo que se ha hecho a múltiples niveles) y colaborando en la medida de mis posibilidades con el mundo del open data, que tanto impacto social puede llegar a causar si se potencia adecuadamente.
Evento
En el primer cuatrimestre de 2015, la comunidad open data global tiene la oportunidad de disfrutar de dos eventos a escala internacional los cuales promueven el acceso abierto a la información pública para su transformación en soluciones prácticas para la ciudadanía.
El primero de ellos se celebrará el próximo 21 de febrero, con motivo del Día Mundial de los Datos Abiertos. Organizado por la OKFN España, el Hackatón Internacional de Datos Abiertos tendrá lugar en la misma fecha y espacio que el acto de entrega del II Premio al Conocimiento Abierto, Open Data y Transparencia organizado también por la misma entidad.
El encuentro estará abierto a reutilizadores open data de toda índole –ciudadanos, desarrolladores, periodistas, diseñadores,…- para que desarrollen aplicaciones, herramientas y visualizaciones de datos abiertos; demostrando así el potencial que encierran este recurso para el avance socioeconómico global.
El acceso al evento será libre y gratuito, poniendo a disposición de la comunidad open data internacional diferentes canales para que puedan compartir sus ideas con el resto de participantes. Gracias al streaming de vídeo, hangouts, chats y wiki cualquier miembro en el mundo tendrá la oportunidad de seguir el evento y los diferentes proyectos que se presenten durante la cita.
Asimismo, el próximo 4 de marzo tendrá lugar en Quito (Ecuador) el IEEE Hack Ecuador Challenge 2015, hackathon organizado IEEE STC e-Government e IEEE Computer Society a través de IEEE Ecuador.
El objetivo de este encuentro será el desarrollo de una visualización o aplicación que, reutilizando datos abiertos, optimice los portales electrónicos del gobierno de Ecuador, mejorando y promoviendo los servicios digitales en el sector público del país.
El plazo de inscripción se abrirá el 20 de febrero para todos aquellos interesados que, en grupos compuestos por al menos dos personas, deseen participar en este concurso de datos abiertos.
Tras la celebración del hackathon el 4 de marzo, los participantes tendrán hasta el día 18 del mismo mes para enviar la demo funcional de las aplicaciones desarrolladas durante el encuentro. Un jurado de expertos seleccionará a los finalistas y se anunciarán los ganadores el 8 de abril para, una jornada más tarde, hacer la entrega de premios en la capital ecuatoriana.
A través de sendos hackathons, la comunidad internacional de datos abiertos pretende fomentar la apertura de la información e involucrar a organizaciones cívicas y entidades privadas en la cultura open data para que contribuyan en la generación de soluciones innovadoras a partir de datos abiertos.