Europa

The European Directive 2019/1024 on open data and re-use of public sector information emphasises, among many other aspects, the importance of publishing data in real time. In fact, the document talks about dynamic data, which it defines as "documents in digital format, subject to frequent or real-time updates due to their volatility or rapid obsolescence". According to the Directive, public bodies must make this data available for re-use by citizens immediately after collection, through appropriate APIs and, where possible, as a bulk download.

To explore this further, the European Data Portal, Data.europa.eu, has published the report “Real-time data 2022: Approaches to integrating real-time data sources in data.europa.eu” which analyses the potential of real-time data. It draws on the results of a webinar held by data.europa.eu on 5 April 2022, a recording of which is available on its website.

In addition to detailing the conclusions of the event, the report provides a brief summary of the information and technologies presented at the event, which are useful for real-time data sharing.

The importance of real-time data

The report begins by explaining what real-time data are: data that are frequently updated and delivered immediately after collection, as mentioned above. These data can be of a very heterogeneous nature. The following table gives some examples:

This type of data is widely used to shape applications that report traffic, energy prices, weather forecasts or flows of people in certain spaces. You can find out more about the value of real-time data in this other article.

Real-time data sharing standards

La interoperabilidad es uno de los factores más importantes a tener en cuenta a la hora de seleccionar la tecnología más adecuada para el intercambio de datos en tiempo real. Se precisa un lenguaje común, es decir, formatos de datos comunes e interfaces de acceso a datos que permitan el flujo de datos en tiempo real. Dos estándares que ya son muy utilizados en el ámbito del Internet de las cosas (IoT en sus siglas en inglés) y que pueden ayudar en este sentido son:

SensorThings API (STA)

SensorThings API, from the Open Geospatial Consortium, emerged in 2016 and has been considered a best practice for data sharing in compliance with the INSPIRE Directive.

This standard provides an open and unified framework for encoding and providing access to sensor-generated data streams. It is based on REST and JSON specifications and follows the principles of the OData (OASIS Open Data Protocol) standard.

STA provides common functionalities for creating, reading, updating and deleting sensor resources. It enables the formulation of complex queries tailored to the underlying data model, allowing more direct access to the specific data the user needs. Query options include filtering by time period, observed parameters or resource properties to reduce the volume of data downloaded. It also allows sorting the content of a result by user-specified criteria and provides direct integration with the MQTT standard, which is explained below.

Message Queuing Telemetry Transport (MQTT)

MQTT was invented by Dr. Andy Stanford-Clark of IBM and Arlen Nipper of Arcom (now Eurotech) in 1999. Like STA, it is also an OASIS standard.

The MQTT protocol allows the exchange of messages according to the publish/subscribe principle. The central element of MQTT is the use of brokers, which take incoming messages from publishers and distribute them to all users who have a subscription for that type of data. In this type of environment, data is organised by topics, which are freely defined and allow messages to be grouped into thematic channels to which users subscribe.

The advantages of this system include reduced latency, simplicity and agility, which facilitates its implementation and use in constrained environments (e.g. with limited bandwidth or connectivity).

 In the case of the European portal, users can already find real-time datasets based on MQTT. However, there is not yet a common approach to providing metadata on brokers and the topics they offer, and work is still ongoing.

Other conclusions of the report

As mentioned at the beginning, the webinar on 5 April also served to gather participants' views on the use of real-time data, current challenges in data availability and needs for future improvements. These views are also reflected in this report.

Among the most valued categories of real-time data, users highlighted traffic information and weather data. Data on air pollution, allergens, flood monitoring and stock market information were also mentioned. In this respect, more and more detailed data were requested, especially in the field of mobility and energy in order to be able to compare commodity prices.  Users also highlighted some drawbacks in locating real-time data on the European portal, including the heterogeneity of the information, which requires the use of common standards and formats across countries.

Finally, the report provides a set of recommendations on how to improve the ability to locate real-time data sources through data.europa.eu. To this end, a series of short and medium-term actions have been established, including the collection of use cases, support for data providers and the development of best practices to unify metadata.

You can read the full report here.

Nowadays we can find a great deal of legislative information on the web. Countries, regions and municipalities make their regulatory and legal texts public through various spaces and official bulletins. The use of this information can be of great use in driving improvements in the sector: from facilitating the location of legal information to the development of chatbots capable of resolving citizens' legal queries.

However, locating, accessing and reusing these documents is often complex, due to differences in legal systems, languages and the different technical systems used to store and manage the data.

To address this challenge, the European Union has a standard for identifying and describing legislation called the European Legislation Identifier (ELI).

What is the European Legislation Identifier?

The ELI emerged in 2012 through Council Conclusions (2012/C 325/02) in which the European Union invited Member States to adopt a standard for the identification and description of legal documents. This initiative has been further developed and enriched by new conclusions published in 2017 (2017/C 441/05) and 2019 (2019/C 360/01).

The ELI, which is based on a voluntary agreement between EU countries, aims to facilitate access, sharing and interconnection of legal information published in national, European and global systems. This facilitates their availability as open datasets, fostering their re-use.

Specifically, the ELI allows:

• Identify legislative documents, such as regulations or legal resources, uniquely by means of a unique identifier (URI), understandable by both humans and machines.
• Define the characteristics of each document through automatically processable metadata. To this end, it uses vocabularies defined by means of ontologies agreed and recommended for each field.

Thanks to this, a series of advantages are achieved:

• It provides higher quality and reliability.
• It increases efficiency in information flows, reducing time and saving costs.
• It optimises and speeds up access to legislation from different legal systems by providing information in a uniform manner.
• It improves the interoperability of legal systems, facilitating cooperation between countries.
• Facilitates the re-use of legal data as a basis for new value-added services and products that improve the efficiency of the sector.
• It boosts transparency and accountability of Member States.

Implementation of the ELI in Spain

The ELI is a flexible system that must be adapted to the peculiarities of each territory. In the case of the Spanish legal system, there are various legal and technical aspects that condition its implementation.

One of the main conditioning factors is the plurality of issuers, with regulations at national, regional and local level, each of which has its own means of official publication. In addition, each body publishes documents in the formats it considers appropriate (pdf, html, xml, etc.) and with different metadata. To this must be added linguistic plurality, whereby each bulletin is published in the official languages concerned.

It was therefore agreed that the implementation of the ELI would be carried out in a coordinated manner by all administrations, within the framework of the Sectoral Commission for e-Government (CSAE), in two phases:

• Due to the complexity of local regulations, in the first phase, it was decided to address only the technical specification applicable to the State and the Autonomous Communities, by agreement of the CSAE of 13 March 2018.
• In February 2022, a new version was drafted to include local regulations in its application.

With this new specification, the common guidelines for the implementation of the ELI in the Spanish context are established, but respecting the particularities of each body. In other words, it only includes the minimum elements necessary to guarantee the interoperability of the legal information published at all levels of administration, but each body is still allowed to maintain its own official journals, databases, internal processes, etc.

With regard to the temporal scope, bodies have to apply these specifications in the following way:

• State regulations: apply to those published from 29/12/1978, as well as those published before if they have a consolidated version.
• Autonomous Community legislation: applies to legislation published on or after 29/12/1978.
• Local regulations: each entity may apply its own criteria.

How to implement the ELI?

The website https://www.elidata.es/ offers technical resources for the application of the identifier. It explains the contextual model and provides different templates to facilitate its implementation:

• URI template for state and regional regulations.
• URI template for the official journal.

It also offers the list of common minimum metadata, among other resources.

In addition, to facilitate national coordination and the sharing of experiences, information on the implementation carried out by the different administrations can also be found on the website.

The ELI is already applied, for example, in the Official State Gazette (BOE). From its website it is possible to access all the regulations in the BOE identified with ELI, distinguishing between state and autonomous community regulations. If we take as a reference a regulation such as Royal Decree-Law 24/2021, which transposed several European directives (including the one on open data and reuse of public sector information), we can see that it includes an ELI permalink.

In short, we are faced with a very useful common mechanism to facilitate the interoperability of legal information, which can promote its reuse not only at a national level, but also at a European level, favouring the creation of the European Union's area of freedom, security and justice.

Content prepared by the datos.gob.es team.

Since 2014, the European Commission has been monitoring Member States' digital progress through the annual DESI Digital Economy and Society Index. To do so, it analyses four digital performance indicators: human capital, connectivity, digital technology integration and digital public services.

In this year's edition, Spain is in seventh position, improving two places compared to 2021. It has gone from a score of 57.4% to 60.8%, which represents a growth of almost 6% (the EU average has grown by 3% in the same period). This puts Spain ahead of countries such as Germany, France and Italy. At the head of the EU-27 we find Finland, Denmark and the Netherlands.

It should be noted that the DESI 2022 index is based mainly on data from 2021. Overall, during the COVID-19 pandemic, Member States have made progress in their digitisation efforts, thanks in part to the opportunity provided by the resources allocated by Europe through the NextGenerationEU recovery plan. However, there are still general challenges, related to digital skills gaps, the digital transformation of SMEs and the deployment of advanced 5G networks.

Digital progress in Spain

Spain is above the EU average in all four categories analysed:

• Human capital. Spain improves two positions with respect to 2021 and ranks tenth. It stands out mainly in basic digital skills, while it is only below the EU average in the proportion of information and communication technology (ICT) specialists and graduates. The report highlights that several of the measures outlined in the National Recovery and Resilience Plan aim to boost the acquisition of digital skills, especially for SME employees.

• Connectivity. Spain is one of the EU leaders in terms of connectivity, where it ranks third for the second year in a row. Our country performs particularly well in very high capacity fixed network coverage (94% compared to 70% of the European average), although it still has room for improvement in 5G coverage. In this regard, strategic reforms and investments are being carried out under the National Recovery and Resilience Plan in order to achieve the Digital Decade connectivity targets and reduce the digital divide between urban and rural areas.

• Digital technology integration. This is the area where most progress has been made, with an improvement of five positions. Spain is currently in eleventh place. It stands out especially in the percentage of SMEs with a basic level of digital intensity and which use social networks, online sales media and electronic information exchange systems. In the use of artificial intelligence, we are at the European average. On the other hand, technologies such as cloud and Big Data analysis are still not widespread. To improve these capabilities, professionals with digital skills are needed, something that will help to boost the SME Digitalisation Plan 2021-2025.

• Digital public services. Spain, which has traditionally been a pioneer in this field, is in fifth place, two places above 2021. One of the areas where it performs best is in open data, where it is in third place, well above the European average (95% vs. 81%). In addition, the report highlights how our country is proactively developing new services to respond to the needs of citizens in areas such as health, digital identification, cybersecurity, mobile applications and the integration of AI in the sector. Some examples of projects in which Spain is participating are Genome of Europe and European Self Sovereign identity (ESSIF).

If you would like to go deeper into the analysis of the results of Spain and the other European countries in the DESI index, you can download the reports by country on this website.  In addition, the Spanish e-Government portal provides users with various useful materials, divided by year.

Women in Digital (WiD) Scoreboard

Together with the DESI index, the EU has also published the 2022 edition of the "Women in Digital (WiD) Scoreboard", a report that assesses the digital development of women and their inclusion in areas such as employment and digital entrepreneurship.

In this ranking, Spain is in eighth position, also exceeding the European Union average (64.2% compared to 54.9%). Spanish women stand out especially in terms of Internet use skills, where they are in fourth position compared to European women.

All these data show how Spain continues to make progress in digital matters. Although there are still areas for improvement, investment from Spain's Recovery and Resilience Plan is expected to continue to drive progress, mainly in areas such as the digitisation of businesses, strengthening the digital skills of the population, improving digital connectivity and the digitisation of public administrations. All of this without neglecting support for digital-related research and development (R&D).

Since the publication of Directive (EU) 2019/1024 on open data and re-use of public sector information, the European Commission is undertaking a number of actions to develop the concept of high-value data that this directive introduced as an important novelty in June 2019.

We recall that high-value datasets are defined in this directive as "documents whose re-use is associated with considerable benefits for society, the environment and the economy, in particular because of their suitability for the creation of value-added services, applications and new, decent and quality jobs". The Directive further proposes a first list of six thematic categories of high-value datasets: geospatial, earth observation and environment, meteorology, statistics, corporate and company ownership, and mobility.

In the last three years, numerous initiatives have been launched with the aim of deepening the liberation of this type of datasets and moving towards realising the economic and social benefits derived from their re-use. Studies have been launched such as the “Impact Assessment study on the list of High Value Datasets” by the Commission's DG CONNECT, which presents different options identified for policy-level interventions linked to high-value datasets in the six thematic areas. Or the report “High-value datasets: understanding the perspective of data providers” published by the official European data portal, which aims to understand the perspective of data providers and contains interesting conclusions such as that the perspective is not sufficient to understand where the "high value" actually lies.

A public consultation has also been launched in 2022 to gather public opinion on its draft High-Value Data Act. This draft act already contains a list of specific high-value datasets and provisions for their publication and re-use, which will represent a very significant advance on the objectives of the directive itself. At the end of June, the draft act was also presented to the Committee on Open Data and Re-use of Public Sector Information composed of representatives from EU countries and further progress is expected in September 2022.

For their part, Member States are also carrying out their own work in parallel, as in the case of Spain, which has already started by dedicating the 2019 Aporta Meeting to the promotion of high-value data.

However, the EU's focus on high-value data as a driver of the economy is not unique in the world and there are other initiatives with different degrees of progress and impact that have similar objectives.

Datasets of national interest in Australia

In the case of Australia, a pioneer in this regard, the first National Action Plan of the Australian Open Government Partnership 2016-2018 already contained among its objectives the implementation of actions to develop and publish a framework for high-value datasets and to design how best to facilitate the sharing and use of these datasets through the legislative consultation process.

The Productivity Commission in 2018 recommended recognising a new type of data asset, national interest datasets, defined as datasets that would generate significant benefits for society and would be a special subset of high-value data. At the time, the Australian government committed to appoint a National Data Commissioner, to implement, oversee and regulate a simpler and more efficient data sharing and publishing framework.

However, in 2019 the end-of-term self-assessment report for Australia's first national open government action plan 2016-18 already acknowledged the delay in the initiative. Work was resumed by the National Data Commissioner, who building on previous work continues to conceptualise a framework for identifying high-value data, although no documentation has been released to the general public at this stage.

Aligning open data in Canada

The Canadian Open Government Working Group (COGWG) already started in its 2016-2018 action plan to work on its commitment to align datasets across the country and specifically on the development of a list of priority high-value datasets for collaborative publication across jurisdictions. The plan recognised that publishing common types of data across Canadian jurisdictions would help foster innovation and provide significant socio-economic impact.

In 2018, Canada's Open Government Working Group released an initial list of 17 high-value datasets to be prioritised for publication by federal, provincial, territorial and municipal governments across Canada. This list is part of a report providing common criteria to help identify high-value datasets and is based on work done to unify criteria across levels of government, stakeholder surveys and international standards.

The National Open Government Action Plan 2018-2020 includes a commitment to carry out a pilot project to standardise across jurisdictions five high-value datasets from the list previously identified in the previous plan.

Although the results have not been openly published, the plan's evaluation system acknowledges the delay in meeting this objective as preliminary standards could only be completed for 4 of the 5 high-value datasets. These standards are available through an intranet system to all Canadian public servants (federal, provincial, territorial and municipal), academics and students, as well as to all Canadians by invitation. However, none of the work has been made public nor is it known what datasets they are working on.

India begins work on identifying datasets

More recently, in 2022, the Indian government has published a background note on data accessibility and usage policy in India announcing the development of new policies to improve data access, quality and usage, in line with the technological needs of the next decade.

As with other initiatives in other regions of the world, it recognises the lack of common criteria for consistently identifying and maintaining high-value datasets. It therefore envisages developing a data policy framework that makes data from multiple sources (public and private) accessible through G2G, G2B, B2G and B2B channels.

The objective is also similar to other initiatives, on the one hand, to make public services more efficient, and to enable a new generation of start-ups to drive digital innovation and growth in the Indian economy.

The approaches being followed in different regions of the world to identify and release high-value datasets are very similar and include public consultations, the formation of expert committees, pilot projects and the definition of assessment frameworks. However, we see that development is much slower than expected and that some initiatives, such as those started in Canada or Australia before the EU itself, have not yet been finalised and therefore their impact is not yet known.

For the time being, it seems that the work initiated by the EU is more advanced and, more importantly, more transparent, as the results are being published openly. Let us hope that the initiative does not lose momentum as seems to have happened in Australia or Canada and that we will soon be able to enjoy high-value datasets available for re-use and discuss the impact they have had on society and the European economy.

Content written by Jose Luis Marín, Senior Consultant in Data, Strategy, Innovation & Digitalization.

The contents and views reflected in this publication are the sole responsibility of the author.

The Tourism Data Space event took place on 9 June, organised by Gaia-X, the European private sector initiative for the creation of an open, federated and interoperable data infrastructure to drive the Data Economy while respecting digital sovereignty. During the event, which was held online, international experts from the public and private sector discussed "How can data spaces contribute to the development of tourism in Europe through citizen-centric offerings?”. The event was a success with more than 250 attendees from 21 countries.

The tourism sector has a strong economic weight in Europe, although it has been affected by the COVID-19 pandemic and the drop in international tourist arrivals, which exceeded 70% worldwide. In this context, Gaia-X and data spaces are positioned as a great opportunity for companies in the sector. Gaia-X aims to make European data available to improve the ability to attract tourists by creating more personalised offers, products and services, resulting in an enhanced experience tailored to customers' needs. It was with this premise in mind that the event kicked off, focusing on the requirements and need for a secure, decentralised and citizen-oriented European tourism data space.

The opening speech of the event was given by Carme Artigas, Secretary of State for Digitalisation and Artificial Intelligence of the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Digital Transformation, who highlighted the importance of the tourism sector: "“Finally, we are giving the tourism the importance it deserves also in the data economy. At the EU level, the tourism sector directly contributes to almost 4% of GDP with 2.3 million businesses, majority of which are SMEs”. This sector also employs 22.4% of the service sector workforce, as Francesco Bonfiglio, Director General of Gaia-X AISBL, commented: "This market is worth billions of euros, and is one of the areas with the greatest impact if we decide to invest in a common European data space".

Artigas also stressed that "Before the end of the year we will have a new digital space for tourism at European level, and this is great news", always respecting the basic principles of data sovereignty, privacy, security and interoperability.

Yvo Volman, Chief Data Officer at DG-CNECT (European Commission), explained that in order to achieve the set objectives, empowerment and data sharing also across sectors is essential. This is the only way to establish better services and promote sustainability. The importance of education was also stressed by Natalia Bayona, Director of Innovation, Education and Investment at the World Tourism Organisation (UNWTO): "Tourism is the main employer of women and young people. However, 50% of people working in tourism have only secondary skills. If we want to develop a high-level economic sector, we have to develop education". In her speech, she also focused on the need for a public-private relationship, with projects such as Gaia-X as a spearhead to drive innovation.

This was followed by several presentations focused on providing an overview of the landscape of the Gaia-X Tourism data space in Europe, with experts from different countries. From Spain, Ana Moniche, Senior Analyst at Turismo Andaluz and NECSTourR, and Cristina Núñez, Director of Necstour, spoke about European regional practices for competitive and sustainable tourism, highlighting how European data sharing is fundamental to develop strategies based on quality information. Data sharing also offers companies with fewer resources the possibility of accessing large amounts of data, which they would not be able to access through their own mechanisms.

Dolores Ordóñez, Director of AnySolution and Vice President of the Spanish Gaia-X Hub, also spoke in this section. In her speech, she highlighted the need for collaboration between companies of different sizes and sectors, especially in four major areas: tourism, health, industry 4.0 and mobility. In the section dedicated to the pillars of tourism data spaces, among other speakers, Alberto Palomo, CDO of the Government of Spain, pointed out the importance of generating scalability in data sharing, as well as the creation of a common framework that shapes governance mechanisms that are useful and accepted by industry players. He also warned that the paradigm we are facing is that of an "innovative decentralised infrastructure", something that all participants must be clear about, because of the cultural change it implies.

To conclude, the event was divided into 3 thematic sessions, designed to create an atmosphere of cross-border collaboration and help create a sustainable data infrastructure for the tourism industry. These sessions focused on smart destinations, the tourism value chain and its technological enablers. More information about the event can be found in the video teaser. This event is part of a series of meetings organised by Gaia-X around data spaces. Two previous events have focused on mobility and health. Gaia-X will continue to hold such activities in the coming months, as can be seen in its calendar. In addition, it has launched a magazine and a podcast series to keep up to date with the latest trends related to the data space.

The Commission's drive to promote data spaces within the framework of a European Strategy is based on the firm commitment to a regulatory framework that provides regulatory coherence throughout the Union. In particular, the aim is to establish a solid regulation that offers legal certainty to a model based on respect for rights and freedoms. Thus, initially, two initiatives have been promoted to, on the one hand, establish the regulatory bases of the governance model - already definitively adopted by Regulation (EU) 2022/868 of 30 May - and, on the other hand, to establish harmonised rules on the access and fair use of data throughout the Union.

However, while recognising the importance of the design of this general legal architecture, the effective opening and exchange of data requires a more concrete approach that takes into account the specificities of each sectoral area and, in particular, the difficulties and challenges to be faced. Therefore, taking into account the general regulatory framework referred to above, the Commission has presented the first regulatory initiative for one of these areas, related to health data, which is currently under public consultation and negotiation in the Council of the EU and in the European Parliament, and which is part of the project to create a European health data area.

In particular, beyond facilitating the development of cross-border e-services, the proposal aims to address a triple objective:

• Establish a uniform legal framework to facilitate the development, marketing and use of electronic health record systems by establishing a compulsory self-certification scheme for certain systems, which in any case provides for some exceptions, e.g. general purpose software used in healthcare environments.

• Facilitating patients' electronic access to their own data in the framework of healthcare provision (primary use of health data). In this respect, the proposal seeks to strengthen consistency across Member States in protecting health data irrespective of where the healthcare provision takes place or the type of entity carrying it out.

• Encourage the re-use of such data for other secondary purposes. To this end, a specific governance model is envisaged with a specific body at the head - the so-called European Health Data Space Board - and the deployment of duly coordinated state administrative structures - health data access bodies.

We will look at this last point in more detail below.

The promotion of secondary uses

With regard to the re-use of data for purposes other than health care, the proposed regulation is based on the following evidence: although health data are already being collected and processed using electronic means, in many cases, however, access to them is not facilitated to satisfy other purposes of general interest. For this reason, in general, it is intended to establish a broad regulation that facilitates secondary uses of health data. For example, the elaboration of statistics, the development of training and research activities, such as technological innovation -including the training of algorithms- or personalised medicine.

However, for the purposes of denying access to health data, some secondary uses are expressly declared incompatible, such as:

•  The adoption of decisions detrimental to natural persons, meaning not only those that produce legal effects but also those that significantly affect them. In this respect, changes relating to insurance contracts, such as an increase in the amounts to be paid, are specifically highlighted.

• The carrying out of advertising or marketing activities aimed at healthcare professionals, organisations in the sector or natural persons.

•  Making data available to third parties that are not covered by the data permission granted.

• The development of harmful products and services, including in particular illicit drugs, alcoholic beverages, tobacco products or goods or services that contravene public order or morality.

With regard to the parties obliged to share data, in principle the proposed regulation extends to those who collect and process data with public funding, who must make them available to the competent bodies for access to health data in order to facilitate their re-use. However, given their importance in some States, the regulation also extends its scope of application to private parties providing health services - except in the case of micro-enterprises - and also to professional associations. Specifically, this regulation would affect "any natural or legal person, which is an entity or a body in the health or care sector, or performing research in relation to these sectors, as well as Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies who has the right or obligation, in accordance with this Regulation, applicable Union law or national legislation implementing Union law, or in the case of non-personal data, through control of the technical design of a product and related services, the ability to make available, including to register, provide, restrict access or exchange certain data".

Purpose and conditions of access to health data

The proposed Regulation is based on a broad concept of health data, which includes the following categories: 

The regulation is based on a general rule: access to anonymised data as a measure to reduce privacy risks, although a specific regime is also envisaged for personal data. In this case, the request must include an adequate justification and the data will only be provided in pseudonymised form.

As regards the form of access, the particular sensitivity of health data determines that it is proposed that they should be made available through a secure processing environment that complies with the technical and security standards included in the proposal. In particular, the proposal does not allow that, except for non-personal data, the data are transmitted directly to the person who will re-use them.  Furthermore, it provides for processing to take place in secure environments under the control of the access authorities.

Access authorities for health data

From the perspective of the governance model underpinning the proposal, States should have at least one health data access body to provide electronic access to health data for secondary purposes. In the case of multiple bodies due to requirements arising from their political-administrative organisation, one of them will have a coordinating role. Beyond the organisational freedom of the States to choose one or another organisational formula, it is essential that the independence of the coordinating body be guaranteed, without prejudice to the mechanisms of financial or judicial control.

As already indicated, the main purpose of this measure is to ensure a uniform and consistent application of the regulatory framework for access to health data for secondary purposes across the European Union, in particular as regards the protection of personal data in this sector. In this respect, it is proposed that these bodies should be given the powers to verify compliance with these rules and, in particular, to impose sanctions and other measures such as temporary or definitive exclusion from the European Health Data Area of those who do not comply with their obligations.

The harmonisation sought by the proposed Regulation is also envisaged in the establishment of a standardised process for the issuing of permissions to re-use data for secondary purposes. In particular, in cases where anonymised access to the data is not enough, reasons should be given as to why pseudonymised access is necessary. In the latter case, the request must specify the legal basis for requesting access to the data from the perspective of personal data protection law, the secondary purposes for which the data are intended to be re-used, as well as a description of the data and tools necessary for their processing.

Finally, the proposed regulation includes active disclosure obligations addressed to these bodies about the available datasets. This is an essential measure, since the existence of a catalogue of datasets at European level - based on the interconnection of national datasets - would be extremely useful for promoting not only research and innovation but also decision-making at regulatory and political level. Specifically, for each set of available data, the nature of the data, its source and the conditions for making it available will have to be indicated.

In short, this is a certainly innovative initiative to address the regulatory diversity existing in each Member State, which is, however, at an early stage of processing. Precisely, a participation procedure is currently open that allows for the submission of allegations against the initial drafting until 28 July 2022 through a simple procedure accessible via this link.

Content prepared by Julián Valero, Professor at the University of Murcia and Coordinator of the Research Group "Innovation, Law and Technology" (iDerTec).

The contents and views expressed in this publication are the sole responsibility of the author.

This report published by the European Data Portal (EDP) aims to help open data users in harnessing the potential of the data generated by the Copernicus program. 

The Copernicus project generates high-value satellite data, generating a large amount of Earth observation data, this is in line with the European Data Portal's objective of increasing the accessibility and value of open data. 

The report addresses the following questions, What can I do with Copernicus data? How can I access the data?, and What tools do I need to use the data? using the information found in the European Data Portal, specialized catalogues and examining practical examples of applications using Copernicus data.  

This report is available at this link: "Copernicus data for the open data community"

This report published by the European Data Portal (EDP) covers the following topics.  

What are the needs of open data re-users of public sector institutions in Europe? This question is key to facilitate the publication of open data and support for re-users of EU institutions and Member States' public authorities based on their needs for policy-making, service delivery and organizational management. 

 This discussion paper provides an overview of the state of existing methods and indicators in the European open data landscape to assess the needs of public institutions as data re-users. 

 This overview serves as a basis for a discussion with public sector stakeholders on appropriate methods and indicators for measuring the demand for data from public institutions to encourage the publication of demand-driven data. 

The report is available at this link: "Measuring Data Demand Within the Public Sector"

This report published by the European Data Portal (EDP) covers the following topics. 

Making data available as open data in all EU Member States is vital to harnessing its potential for European society and economy. In order to increase impact effectively, efforts must target the datasets that have the greatest potential in society and the economy. 

 In the regulation on open data and re-use of public sector information, the European Commission is mandated to adopt an implementing regulation specifying high-value datasets. 

 The line of argument developed in this report parallels what the Commission has done during the first quarter of 2021, to prepare the implementing regulation that includes a list of high-value datasets. This report reviews relevant literature, policy decisions and national initiatives to enable a deeper understanding of the situation around assessing the value of datasets. 

The report is available at this link: "High-Value Datasets: Understanding the Data Providers' Perspective" 

This report published by the European Data Portal (EDP) explores existing and emerging developments and initiatives around data sharing using data spaces. 

The objective is twofold: to identify the owners of open data involved in the implementation of data spaces and to reflect on the role that open data portals (with special attention to data.europa.eu) could play in this implementation. 

After documentary research and interviews with the promoters of data spaces, it is analyzed how data.europa.eu could be positioned in the common European data spaces that are emerging. 

The report is available at this link: "Data.europa.eu y los espacios comunes de datos europeos: un informe sobre retos y oportunidades"